Tag: social enterprise (Page 1 of 6)

Beneficiaries may be clients, but they are not always customers.

June 22, 2023 / jonathanawade

Social service organizations have beneficiaries; these are the people who benefit from the programs and services being provided. Non-profits, and those who register as charities, often will refer to these beneficiaries as “clients,” but this nomenclature gets confusing when the organization starts a social enterprise.

It is Social Delta’s practice to refer to clients or customers as those who PAY for a good or a service, and to specifically use the term “beneficiaries” for those folks who benefit from FREE (or more accurately, subsidized) benefits and services offered in our communities.

Members are different again. Members are those individuals who support an organization with an exchange of value, but they are not really customers. Membership dues or fees are paid in exchange for a bundle of goods and services reserved for members alone (newsletter, voting rights at the AGM, discounts with third-party suppliers, etc). It is notable that many of these member benefits are not used by the majority of most members of a non-profit organization. Ironically, although “membership” revenue might be characterized as an income earning line of business, the membership fee in most cases is more like a donation than a purchase of goods or products.

The first question many might ask is: “Why it is important to make a distinction, when customers, members, and beneficiaries are getting value from the organization?” The answer lies in how these groups of individuals can be identified, contacted, cultivated and supported.

When are beneficiaries considered customers? Rarely.

Yes, in some cases, beneficiaries can be—or can become—customers. It does occur. Tenants in low-income housing run by a charity typically pay something for their housing. There may be a nominal fee for parts in a non-profit bicycle cooperative. If a social enterprise operating from within a non-profit organization starts charging for goods and services it has traditionally offered for free, then they are migrating from a “free to fee” model of delivery and their customers may very well be beneficiaries of the social mission through the organization’s social enterprise activities.

Those who are benefiting from programs, services and products offered by a community organization are often not good prospects as paying customers. Unsurprisingly, this statement is especially true for organizations working with the most marginalized and needy in our society. It is incredulous to think that a domestic violence victim would have to pay for their room at a shelter, for example. Likewise, an at-risk youth living on the street is not likely to accept help if they have to pay for it.

Knowing that past beneficiaries are not typically good customer prospects is important in setting expectations for new social enterprises. Many board members and senior non-profit staff might assume that their mailing list of past beneficiaries is a “warm prospect” list when they start selling something.

However, it is the experience of Social Delta that the conversion of a beneficiary to a customer is arduous, typically yields less-than-expected sales, and can jeopardize how a charity is viewed by the people it is trying to help. A modest fee might support a sense of dignity for a beneificiary, but it will rarely generate the revenue needed to pay the cost of providing that good or service.

Beneficiaries are not always customers…but customers are always beneficiaries of a social enterprise.

“Which stakeholders are the best prospects?”

It will vary by organization, and by what is being sold, of course, but current and past volunteers and donors, particularly monthly donors and/or high value donors, may both be worth cultivating as warm sales leads. Members, perhaps counter-intuitively, typically bristle when the individual elements of their “membership bundle” each get a price tag, and they will often not become loyal customers.

The stark truth, however, is that most successful social enterprises look outside of their stakeholder network to acquire the sufficient number of customers to become sustainable. Early and significant investments in marketing will help to reach out to new audiences…and in doing so, will convert these new customers to become stakeholders in the mission of the organization through their purchases.

Social Enterprise Job Opportunity in Ottawa

November 24, 2021 / jonathanawade

OREC (the Ottawa Renewable Energy Cooperative) is seeking to hire a part-time Communications Manager to support the day-to-day operations, member and investor relations, and public-facing communications of the co-operative.

You can see a full job posting on their website, here: https://www.orec.ca/careers/

Applications for this position are to be submitted by December 7, 2021.

Chatbots in social enterprise

August 3, 2021 / jonathanawade

Some estimates state that 80% of all companies will use chatbots to generate leads or build customer loyalty in the next few years. How does this, and how should this, affect social enterprises?

First, what is a chatbot? It is an automated “instant message” discussion that “pops up” on a website or social media platform to engage the potential customer with either a text or voice conversation. The goal of a chatbot is to mimic genuine human interaction through clever writing and the use of artificial intelligence. In some cases sophisticated algorithms combined with user data ensure the outputs are as personalized as possible, only more efficient.

Chatbots typically start with an open question, such as “How can I help you today?” Users who choose to engage will often ask a question that can be answered by one of perhaps hundreds of pre-programmed responses (Chatbots, then become a customer service robot that can access an almost infinite number of responses in a Frequently Asked Questions database). As the “conversation” proceeds, the bot typically will request a prospect/customer’s name and email address and remarkably, statistics show that the majority of site visitors will actually provide that information (which is very hard to get via other customer development tools and activities).

Chatbots are counter intuitive to many marketing professionals, and to social change entrepreneurs. They challenge the notion that personal interaction is one of the most effective ways to generate leads, build loyalty, and engage customers. The thought that artificial intelligence can do this work for social enterprise may feel, somehow…wrong. Duplicitous even.

However, chatbots are tireless workers who never need time off, can respond to thousands of interactions simultaneously, and can create new leads from browsing users, effectively deliver key messages or marketing promotions, and can, in fact, answer the majority of basic questions. Websites are static, whereas chatbots create the illusion of dynamic interaction. If a user wants to find out the store’s opening hours on the long weekend, they can choose to find that information on what might be thousands of pages on the website…or they can simply ask the chatbot and have a response in seconds. However, it is important to recognize that chatbots should not compensate for bad web design, they should augment an easily navigated website.

There are some downsides, of course. Estimates suggest that the programming and technology required to create an effective chatbot can cost $20-$30K. This is a lot for an early stage business, and it may be difficult to justify without concrete proof that it will help bolster sales and the customer relationship. Investing in a chatbot, fundamentally requires a leap of faith, and it can also diminish (or deplete) available funds for other forms of marketing. It is not surprising that the relatively simple-to-use chatbot plugin for Facebook has become common. From the 2016 launch to mid-2018, there were over 300,000 active chatbots on Facebook.

Also, chatbots need to be able to pass the (prospective) customer to a live agent if the customer becomes frustrated, or if they are not getting the information they need. It is often difficult for small businesses to make this transition from bot to human interaction seamless. A bot can book an appointment with a customer representative, but there is often a few hours delay (or more) and this means that the “lead” might grow cold or even find an alternative product online.

So, is a chatbot the right thing for a social enterprise? In truth, chatbots are becoming the norm on many commercial websites, and in the last few years, online users appear to be embracing them as useful tools to help them access information on a company or its products. However, chatbots are most useful only if your customers embrace them and only if they work well. They can be particularly effective for businesses that have high web traffic, and in cases were simple responses are all that is needed in most circumstances. If your business sells a toy that has specifications that are important to share (are they recyclable, for example) that is an easy question to answer. However, if your business is selling facilitation services, then answering a prospective client in person might be a better way to convey your value.

Social Delta has been surprised at the statistics on the effectiveness of chatbots, and therefore advises that they not be dismissed as a tool in the marketing toolbox; however, as with all marketing tools, chatbots should be evaluated by the social entrepreneur by considering their value to the business. They should strategically employ the technology if there is an expectation of benefit (financial or mission impact) that exceeds the cost (money or time or reputation).

However, social entrepreneurs should not presume the tool to be invasive or annoying; somewhat remarkably, the studies show chatbots to be a strong customer cultivation tool in many cases.

Dutch Social Enterprises: Leading by Example

January 12, 2021 / jonathanawade

In the Netherlands there is a national organization dedicated to promoting and supporting social enterprise.

They recently released a report that documents how leading social enterprises in their country are affecting the way business is done. Those social enterprises, by doing business the right way, are leading by example.

I particularly like their analysis which indicates that social enterprise can effect change in three ways:

Raising the possible are the activities that show how business can be done responsibly, so that other businesses can choose to adopt those sustainable practices as well.
Raising the desirable are the activities that change norms and values in society and increase cultural pressures, which motivates executives to act sustainably.
Raising the acceptable are the activities that contribute to higher institutionalized, formal standards, so that it becomes unacceptable not to adopt more sustainable practices.

To paraphrase, social enterprises can show what is can be done, they can challenge existing business practices and they can actually set the bar higher for other businesses to emulate.

The report is full of excellent resources, ideas, and indications of what success looks like for any social enterprise. It offers an aspiration view for social entrepreneurs wishing to grow their social impact.

Social Delta recommends it as inspirational (yet practical) reading. Download it or read it online for free here.

Build Back Better

October 27, 2020 / jonathanawade

These are times when starting or expanding a social enterprise is either a fantastic opportunity or an impossible folly.

There are unquestionably many challenges facing people and communities locally, nationally and globally as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, and perhaps not entirely by coincidence, we see cracks and fissures appear in the social fabric: polarized and angry democracies, growing income disparities, wildly unsustainable consumerism, incredibly potent and punishing environmental changes, more xenophobia and irrational fear of “others,” increasing intolerance and racism, and a sincere lack of resources as our economies are (and have been) shown to be fragile constructs.

If social action is borne of injustice and and fomenting of the desire for positive change, then surely we must look at new ways of creating a just and sustainable society. Social enterprise is potential tool to make that happen, although starting any sort of business in a pandemic is risky; fantastic or folly, indeed.

I have many thoughts on how we can redesign business and movements and individual actions and responsibilities. However, I believe that my colleague and friend Vinod Rajesekaran, of Future of Good, expressed it brilliantly in his recent article “Stop idolizing your sector and demonizing another.” I quote from him directly:

Let’s build back better by asking different questions. When an organization or a project inspires you, don’t ask about their legal structure. Instead, look deeper and ask about their values, intentions, and actions. Look at the ratio between the highest and lowest paid workers, look at their carbon footprint, look at how diverse their leadership teams and boards are, look at how they act on reconciliation everyday, look at how well they include and give voice to their stakeholders, and follow the money — look at where they save and what they invest their money in.

One of the first questions I get from aspiring social entrepreneurs is about how (and when) they should incorporate. I always tell them “form follows function” and that they should wait as long as possible before they formalize their social purpose in an organizational structure. Only once they’ve identified and lived by their values, intentions and actions (ie determined their function) will they know the best structure to support their work. In fact, once they’ve started their work in earnest, the form of their business is almost always determined for them.

We are, regrettably, stuck with largely antiquated legislation that enshrines for profit, co-operative, or non-profit structures, myths, and expections. However, we can–and must–push the parameters of each of these structures to create businesses that measurably improve social conditions, justice, fairness and protection of the environment.

In the coming years, we can, person by person, build back better.

The art of getting people to do what they don’t want to do.

October 15, 2020 / jonathanawade

Social entrepreneurs operate businesses that create social benefits. Surely, selling services and products in the pursuit of justice, environmental sustainability, and support for the marginalized should be easy. After all, doesn’t every consumer want to make the world a better place?

Well, no, actually.

Most consumers buy to satisfy some personal need. They may be hungry and buy food. They may desire to smell nice and buy body products or perfumes. They may want to be entertained and buy a video streaming subscription. They may want the cheapest price and buy from huge online retailers. Not many make purchases based upon maximizing social welfare.

There are some consumers, of course, who shop based upon a set of community values, but as much as we’d like to think otherwise, these conscious consumers remain in the minority. We must also remember—particularly now during economic challenges for many—that some consumers may not be able to afford to purchase according to their altruistic values.

The art of encouraging citizens to undertake something that creates social value is called social marketing. Whether it is to reduce speeding, or to encourage voting, or to purchase ethically sourced food, social marketers use commercial marketing techniques and concepts—advertising, traditional and social media, direct mail, email broadcasts, word of mouth, customer journey, relationship marketing, etc—to bring about and support social change.

A recently read article provides some useful guidance to anyone trying to convince someone to do something that they don’t instinctively want to do. Summarizing somewhat, the recommendations were as follows:

Break down the activity into small steps
Provide progress indicators (or an understanding of the cost/commitment required)
Provide incentives for completion (intrinsic rewards whenever possible)
Instill competence (allow people to learn or share their knowledge)
Allow for autonomy (people resist being controlled)
Ensure they understand the context/purpose (relatedness).

These recommendations work well if you are convincing a child to get immunized (the example used in the article), to encourage someone to get sober, or to complete a university course.

But how do we use these recommendations to encourage consumers to make the right purchasing decisions? Below is a rephrasing of the recommendations to support social marketing efforts for the social entrepreneur:

Don’t try to explain your entire social value proposition at once. Recognize that consumers may need to understand elements of your mission, not the entire social challenge you are addressing.
Whenever possible, link their purchase to a tangible goal. “By purchasing this product, you’re providing a young person with job training.”
Use loyalty programs, discounts, contests or other “prizes” to reward your customers. Use these extrinsic rewards whenever the intrinsic rewards—like the knowledge that they are helping to support their community—are insufficiently motivating.
Provide your consumers with links to further information, crowdfunding, ways to get involved, or other learning and empowering tools. Think of each consumer as a potential ally in your social mission, and use language, images, and information that give them competence.
Do not undermine your competition, or use negative advertising messages to insinuate to your customer that they need to buy your product over the competitor’s product. If you engage them based upon their own needs and expectations, that provides them with the autonomy to make the (right) choice to buy your product.
Provide context for your social enterprise. It is a challenge to not overwhelm your customer with details while informing and engaging them in your mission. Providing succinct context can help them relate to how their purchase contributes to not only meeting their needs (for example, great coffee) but also the community needs (for example, fair wages). Context links their action as a consumer with your mission.

One last note that we frequently share with our social enterprise clients: Do not assume that your social mission alone will sell your products or services. The vast majority of purchasing decisions are affected by price and market perceptions of quality (which also includes convenience and availability). If you aren’t competing on price and quality, social marketing strategies and activities will have only a marginal effect on consumer choices.

Social Delta

Investment Readiness Program Consulting

Definition of Social Enterprise

RECIPE FOR IMPACT™

Search the site

Tags